Note that the appropriate staff response to a query about an Order that has been reviewed and found unworthy is, "We are studying this organization to determine if we should recognize it." This may get old when the same answer is offered years later, but this provides the needed data without ever saying a bad word about such Orders. In this way one hopes not to poison ground where one may wish someday to tread.
----
==Recognition of Membership in Orders of Chivalry==
'''Proposal: The Society should maintain and publish a listing of those chivalric memberships recognized, both for present Augustans and for others.'''
----
==Orders Qualifying for Crusader Membership in the SDKLJ==
'''Proposal: The Society should maintain and publish a list of those Orders of Chivalry which the Society recognizes, and which the Society accepts as having fought in the Holy Lands during the Crusades, or is a legitimate descendant of such an Order.'''
----
==List of Postnominals==
'''Proposal: The Society should maintain and publish a [[List of Postnominals]] used in Society publications, recognized by the Society at any time, granted by the Society, or likely to be of value to members. This list should include postnominals not recognized by the Society for historical purposes, and these should be so flagged.'''
----
==''Guide to Orders of Chivalry''==
The present ''Guide to Orders of Chivalry'' has been withdrawn from sale to to it's having been rendered remarkably obsolete by the passing of time. A new edition would require substantial work by the Chivalry Department, but the result could benefit both our treasury and our reputation.
'''Proposal: The Society should publish a new edition of the ''Guide to Orders of Chivalry'', and to produce further editions as changes in the field dictate.'''
----