Facilities Vision

Revision as of 17:54, 25 February 2015 by Bruce (Talk | contribs)

The current physical facilities of The Augustan Society, Inc., are the Consuls' home and four storage units a mile away, all located in southern Orange County, Florida. This arrangement is far from ideal, and incurs delays and expenses we would prefer to avoid. Our vision is to obtain a unified Headquarters facility outside Consuls' home.

The Society has had a public Headquarters for about half of its existence, the other half being worked out of the private home of the Founder or Consuls. The advantages of a public Headquarters are many, including:

  • Security from the termination of the Consuls
  • The ability to collect all Society property to one location
  • The ability to bring volunteers in to assist with the work
  • The ability to hire paid staff
  • The ability to welcome guests, patrons, and members
  • The ability to impress such guests, patrons, and members with the size and stability of the Society
  • Improved ability to obtain grants
  • Avoidance of the need to relocate (as often)
  • Avoidance of the need to change our mailing address (with consequent loss of contact)

Proposal: The Society must set a goal of obtaining (and retaining) a public Headquarters. To ensure that such a facility may be retained, we must create an Investment Fund sufficient that its revenue will cover the costs of rent, utilities, and taxes (if any).

The location of a rented Headquarters is presently constrained by the location of the Consuls, who would naturally be unwilling to commute extended distances. Should a move be coincident with replacing the present Consuls (something they would not object to), the location could be moved to any suitable place.

However, given the substantial expenditure of time and labor (if not expense) of relocating, and that the Society cannot afford the loss of productivity that accompanies a move, even if it might afford the expense, short-term rentals are unlikely to be in the best long-term interest of the Society.

Proposal: The Society should adopt a policy that any lease or rental be guaranteed for a term of not less than five years with maximum rent defined, and that funds sufficient to secure the facility for said term be identified before a lease or rent is authorized.

Further advantages may be had from owning rather than renting, including:

  • The ability to modify the facility to better meet operational needs
  • The ability to decorate the facility to better express our Society's personality
  • The ability to do the above without concern for losing the value when obliged to relocate
  • Avoidance of the need to relocate (except as the Society may feel the need)

Proposal: The Society must set a goal of obtaining (and retaining) a public Headquarters that is owned by the Society. To ensure that such a facility may be retained, we must create an Investment Fund sufficient that its revenue will cover both the initial capital cost of acquisition and modification to our purposes, and the ongoing costs of utilities, repairs, and taxes (if any).

The location of such a permanent Headquarters should not be constrained to the vicinity of the present Consuls. One would expect the use of the facility to long outlast their service, and Orlando may not be the best location in the long term. At some point, it will be appropriate to determine what considerations should be given to a permanent location, and a search for a nation, city, neighborhood, and parcel then be based on those considerations.

Items to receive consideration should include:

  1. Location in the United States, for reasons of postal and tax savings.
  2. Location within an hour of an international airport.
  3. Location within an hour of Amtrak service.
  4. Public transit available from the two above; this might be taxis.
  5. Located where a 50-foot rise in sea levels will not threaten the location or road connections to the mainland.
  6. Within a Staples delivery area.
  7. Within two hours of a book bindery and rebindery.

The last of these will likely be the most restrictive, and thus may be the worth searching first.

The goals above are not in conflict. The first is likely to be easier to obtain, and a portion of the investments dedicated to rent under the first may be diverted to purchase the facility in the third. This is particularly true as $285,000 of the Investment Fund is the Balling bequest, which is restricted to capital purchases (by original intent, if not contract).

All that said, a facility, or funds to purchase one, may appear as a gift or grant. In that case, it may be possible to leapfrog the first goal for the last. While this will of course be tempting, the Society should seriously consider if the location offered is in the long-term best interests of the Society. Worst case, we might accept the gift or grant in a sub-optimal location, then sell it and move at a later date (perhaps after the death of the patron or expiration of the grant).


Last modified on 25 February 2015, at 17:54